Skip to content

Rebbin 0.9

I released a you-should-have-released-it-months-ago version :)

What’s new?

  • SQLite 3 support

What’s changed?

  • Requires Rails 1.0
  • Atom 0.3 feed dropped

http://rebbin.berlios.de/

A live version here: http://pasteserver.net/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Buzz
  • HackerNews
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Tumblr
This was written by Lawrence. Posted on Friday, March 17, 2006, at 7:00 pm. Filed under Uncategorized. Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • http://braindumplings.com Adam

    I get a corrupted download of 0.9, in the tar.gz format. Also, the .bz2 version seems to be missing from the berlios.de servers.

    md5sum:

    07d63a478b4d5fc29762a39874bb1482 rebbin-0.9.tar.gz

  • http://oluyede.org/blog Lawrence

    Fixed. Thanks

  • http://sten-net.de Jannis

    Hey. I just noticed that you have #!/usr/bin/ruby1.8 in the header of public/dispatch.fcgi. You might want to change that to “#!/usr/bin/env ruby”.

  • http://www.oluyede.org/blog/ Lawrence

    Fixed, thanks

  • mind

    Well, rebbin is cool, i like the its clean interface, but it has a GREAT problem from my viewpoint: the license.

    I Think that BSD license is not a really good way for license a sw: it doesn’t protect you and the community. IMHO the Free (as in Freedom) Software and Open Source software, aren’t only a technical phenomenon but are much legal that can be thought. As RMS and Eben Moglen sayd: “It’s still the licence, dummies” :)

    P.S.: Pasteserver.net ask for a userid and a password, where i can sign up?

  • http://www.oluyede.org/blog/ Lawrence

    Why do you think giving code under BSD is a problem :) ? The community recognize a piece of software if it’s valid. And rebbin to be honest is a puppet project, nothing serious. Anyway I prefer the opensource movement instead of what FSF has to say. So I prefer BSD and MIT instead of GPL or LGPL. :)

  • mind

    Give software under BSD license is a problem because the license doesn’t protect the freedom of the software itself, look what Apple did with opendarwin… I think that BSD is masochist, for the developers and the community around a piece of sw. Anyone can take rebbin, improve it without give back *anything, IMHO is absurd….

  • http://www.oluyede.org/blog/ Lawrence

    IMHO not because BSD is not a magical license like GPL that no one really understand. It’s very simple: write opensource software and maintain the copyright. There’s tons of people who use BSD without problems and they know what they’re going to do. I don’t like FSF like license. GPL is viral, it makes sense only for self-contained applications.

    ps. the Apple rumors of closing darwin are basically false, and anyway if it were true, what’s the real matter? Do you really need their operating system? They’re a PROFIT and COMMERCIAL corporation :-) It’s stupid for the people to wake up and say “but we need that code”. For what? People who really need the source of the apple operating system can afford to buy it.

  • Rik

    Just wondering: when the server is started, which URL should I browse to? Nothing obvious seems to work.

  • http://www.oluyede.org/blog/ Lawrence

    when you start rails from the command line it says on the shell which port it uses. Usually is 3000. Try to browse to localhost:3000/paste

  • http://rikkus.info Rik Hemsley

    Thanks, I’d got to localhost:3000, but couldn’t work out what the path was.

    Nice app!

  • http://www.oluyede.org/blog/ Lawrence

    You have to delete public/index.html to have it on the root or go to /paste. I’ve deleted public/index.html in the svn trunk. Thanks for pointing that out!