http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2006/04/05/java-sucks-for-me/ Everything considered harmful Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:59:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2006/04/05/java-sucks-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-53547 podo Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:53:01 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2006/04/05/java-sucks-for-me/#comment-53547 <p>well, java was here long before .net</p> well, java was here long before .net

]]> http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2006/04/05/java-sucks-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1577 Lawrence Tue, 09 May 2006 14:47:51 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2006/04/05/java-sucks-for-me/#comment-1577 <p>I know Raffaele that in Java a String is not an array of chars. But ideally to me that's wrong. I want a language where a string is a sequence of characters. I don't care about the primitiveness or not of the types. That's a flaw of the design, eventually Java designers copied the boxing-unboxing mechanism brought with .NET :)</p> I know Raffaele that in Java a String is not an array of chars. But ideally to me that’s wrong. I want a language where a string is a sequence of characters. I don’t care about the primitiveness or not of the types. That’s a flaw of the design, eventually Java designers copied the boxing-unboxing mechanism brought with .NET

]]> http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2006/04/05/java-sucks-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1576 RaffaeleCastagno Tue, 09 May 2006 11:09:44 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2006/04/05/java-sucks-for-me/#comment-1576 <p>A String is not an array of chars, but an object. And it's a java standard to not expose properties as public, but always using the javabean standard. Arrays (arr[], and not java.lang.Array) are instead a builtin data type, and not objects.</p> A String is not an array of chars, but an object. And it’s a java standard to not expose properties as public, but always using the javabean standard. Arrays (arr[], and not java.lang.Array) are instead a builtin data type, and not objects.

]]>