Comments on: Playing with django.test http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/ Everything considered harmful Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:49:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Lawrence http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-33856 Lawrence Sat, 05 May 2007 08:57:19 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-33856 <p>To be honest I also used stubs in my project. The deal is using fixtures to test against data resembling the real data. That's why they are useful in Django. Not as lean as Rails' but not bad :-)</p> To be honest I also used stubs in my project. The deal is using fixtures to test against data resembling the real data. That’s why they are useful in Django. Not as lean as Rails’ but not bad :-)

]]> By: Michael Trier http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-33822 Michael Trier Sat, 05 May 2007 01:03:50 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-33822 <p>Interesting that you like fixtures because most of the people I know, myself included, are always looking for alternatives. Fixtures seem like a nice idea until you get an application of any serious size or complexity. They really fall down. The consensus seems to be to put more reliance on mocking.</p> Interesting that you like fixtures because most of the people I know, myself included, are always looking for alternatives. Fixtures seem like a nice idea until you get an application of any serious size or complexity. They really fall down. The consensus seems to be to put more reliance on mocking.

]]> By: Lawrence http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-22889 Lawrence Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:47:07 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-22889 <p>@fonso: the problem has been fixed weeks ago and I honestly tell you that I don't remember what was it. I have to check in svn logs :-)</p> <p>Thanks anyway</p> @fonso: the problem has been fixed weeks ago and I honestly tell you that I don’t remember what was it. I have to check in svn logs :-)

Thanks anyway

]]> By: fonso http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-22887 fonso Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:40:10 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-22887 <p>Christopher, Maybe your URLs didn't have an ending slash? If they didn't, Django is configured by default to append it and redirect to the resulting URL.</p> Christopher, Maybe your URLs didn’t have an ending slash? If they didn’t, Django is configured by default to append it and redirect to the resulting URL.

]]> By: Maxime Biais http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-19098 Maxime Biais Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:27:40 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-19098 <p>Hi !</p> <p>I'm using JMeter: http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/ to test and benchmark my django apps.</p> Hi !

I’m using JMeter: http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/ to test and benchmark my django apps.

]]> By: Lawrence http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15464 Lawrence Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:28:49 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15464 <p>Cool Jacob! I'll keep on lurking django-dev ;-)</p> Cool Jacob! I’ll keep on lurking django-dev ;-)

]]> By: Jacob Kaplan-Moss http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15460 Jacob Kaplan-Moss Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:05:44 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15460 <p>Indeed, I'm waiting for #2333 myself :) Stay tunned, because I think we're almost there -- there are just a few small things to iron out first.</p> Indeed, I’m waiting for #2333 myself :) Stay tunned, because I think we’re almost there — there are just a few small things to iron out first.

]]> By: Lawrence http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15321 Lawrence Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:24:14 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15321 <p>Yes I know about that patch. I'm gonna wait until it will be merged in the trunk by the way</p> Yes I know about that patch. I’m gonna wait until it will be merged in the trunk by the way

]]> By: Kumar McMillan http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15293 Kumar McMillan Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:20:08 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15293 <p>There is a usable patch for fixtures attached to http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2333</p> <p>on a separate but related note, I'm working on a standalone module, fixture (http://code.google.com/p/fixture/), which is a framework of sorts, pluggable into any test suite. I'm holding off on supporting django though, since there is so much work being done on their own fixtures api.</p> There is a usable patch for fixtures attached to http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2333

on a separate but related note, I’m working on a standalone module, fixture (http://code.google.com/p/fixture/), which is a framework of sorts, pluggable into any test suite. I’m holding off on supporting django though, since there is so much work being done on their own fixtures api.

]]> By: Lawrence http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15270 Lawrence Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:18:18 +0000 http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2007/01/29/playing-with-djangotest/#comment-15270 <p>301/302 are redirects. I think you should see in the body but usually it's not a wrong response code.</p> <p>A fixture is simply a collection of data to feed the testing framework.</p> 301/302 are redirects. I think you should see in the body but usually it’s not a wrong response code.

A fixture is simply a collection of data to feed the testing framework.

]]>