<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If XML-RPC is really better than REST, it&#8217;s not for these reasons.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2008/03/24/if-xml-rpc-is-really-better-than-rest-its-not-for-there-reasons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2008/03/24/if-xml-rpc-is-really-better-than-rest-its-not-for-there-reasons/</link>
	<description>Everything considered harmful</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: uberto</title>
		<link>http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2008/03/24/if-xml-rpc-is-really-better-than-rest-its-not-for-there-reasons/#comment-53381</link>
		<dc:creator>uberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oluyede.org/blog/2008/03/24/if-xml-rpc-is-really-better-than-rest-its-not-for-there-reasons/#comment-53381</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They seem to me 10 reasons to prefer XML-RPC over SOAP... they have nothing to do with REST.
For really complex queries XML-RPC has some advantage over REST, generally speaking when you need so many or so complex parameters than REST url became unreadable, there is no point to support it.
Apart from that, go with REST! ,)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They seem to me 10 reasons to prefer XML-RPC over SOAP&#8230; they have nothing to do with REST.
For really complex queries XML-RPC has some advantage over REST, generally speaking when you need so many or so complex parameters than REST url became unreadable, there is no point to support it.
Apart from that, go with REST! ,)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
